很多考鸭都在头疼的雅思写作这座大山，是时候该卸下了。和小站雅思君一起来了解一下雅思作文中需要注意的6个雅思写作细节问题吧。下面小编就和大家分享雅思写作拿高分这六个细节很重要，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思写作拿高分这六个细节很重要

雅思写作细节一：标点书写问题

按英文书写规定，标点应紧挨着它的附着意群进行标注，与另一个意群要以一个字符的空格隔开。但是在实际作文中经常发现学生不论什么标点都会当作一个单词来对待，即标点前后都空下空格，结果给人以标点满天飞的感觉，影响了文章的美感。有例为证：

First, energy and other natural resources have become more abundant, not less so , since the book ‘ The Limits to Growth ’ was published by a group of scientists .

可以看出，标点像独行侠一样出现在句子中，会给人以喧宾夺主的感觉。所以大家平时练习时就要注意正确书写标点。

雅思写作细节二：句首单词首字母大小写问题

通常情况下，同学们只要感觉是个句子就都把句首单词首字母大写了，但是在实际写作中情况如何呢?下面我们来看个例子。

Some corpora attempt to cover the language as a whole; others are extremely selective.

分号的作用是对关系非常紧密的句子进行分隔，所以后一个句子只是前一个的附属，并不是一个独立的新句子，所以首字母仍然要小写的。这个现象同样适用于冒号、破折号、括号。

雅思写作细节三：书写过于随意

每个人都有自己的书写习惯，但是雅思考试毕竟是要给外国人看的，所以大家如果能够在书写习惯上贴近老外，肯定会给人以亲切的卷面印象。比如不要书写得过于密集，以免让人看不清单词，影响理解。也不要写得过于稀疏而让人无法在eye span 范围内看到完整的意群，从而影响考官阅读。字不要写得太大，也不要太小。尽量不要连写以免造成l,r,n,m等混淆不清，造成考官阅卷障碍。

雅思写作细节四：写作格式混乱

英文写作格式主要有齐头式和缩进式。通常齐头式因为顶头书写且段与段之间空出一行，所以会给人以整洁的感觉，也比较推荐大家使用这种格式。缩进式和中文的写作格式相似，即每一段的开头句缩进，但是段落之间没有空行，所以不是很受欢迎。经常在作文中看到同学们用的是“齐头式+缩进式”，即段首句缩进+段落之间空行，给人以不伦不类的感觉，同学们一定要注意。

雅思写作细节五：总结段缺失

很多学生在写作时因为时间不充裕无法写出总结段，于是给阅卷者没完成任务的感觉。建议考生尽量要写最后的summary，无论是task1还是task2。因为同学们可以利用最后一段来点题、归纳，这样可以最大限度地避免因为语言功底不深而导致的文章结构不明晰，说服力不强等问题，即用形式来弥补内容上无法克服的困难。

另外，因为开头结尾段是我们平时练习得比较熟练的部分，所以我们很容易就搞定的，为什么放着拿分的部分不写呢?!

雅思写作细节六：分段过多或者过少

大家可以设想一下，当你拿着一篇只有一段的很长的文章时，是不是会有很晕的感觉?尤其是当我们的写作能力有限，文字表达没有吸引力时，怎么能让考官有耐心看完你的文章呢?再设想一下，当你看的文章分成很多的段落，而你的论证能力有限，费了半天劲也写不出几个句子，会不会每段都给人以流水账的感觉呢?

所以，对于考试作文，要想既用形式掩饰内容的不足，又能给考官以好印象，那么请把雅思写作task1段落划分控制在3-5段，雅思写作task2控制在4-6段，既能体现段落分配清晰，突出自己要表达的内容，又能避免论证太过分散而中心不明确。

雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文

In the past, buildings often reflected the culture of a society but today all modern buildings look alike and cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar.

What do you think is the reason for this, and is it a good thing or a bad thing?

Model Answer:

Every city has its architectural character, but the similarities between cities are more obvious these days than in the past. In my opinion, one reason for this is the high price of land.

In most large cities, land is scarce and consequently it is very valuable. This has led to the construction of tall buildings which occupy only a small area of land while providing lots of floor space where people can live or work. Buildings of this type are made of concrete and steel and can be built comparatively quickly using prefabricated materials. They do not use local materials, such as stone, timber or brick, which used to give cities their individual character. In consequence many cities. now look very much the same and you might not know whether you were in Brisbane, Bangkok or Berlin when you are on the street.

While I realise that we cannot stand in the way of progress, I believe that cities should try to keep some individuality. For example, in Paris it is prohibited to build very tall buildings in the centre of the city, as this would spoil the overall appearance of the skyline. Other cities have chosen to design unique buildings to ensure they look different. The twin towers in Kuala Lumpur or the Opera House in Sydney are examples of this approach, and I agree with this kind of initiative.

All in all, although it is regrettable that modem cities look similar, I tend to feel that this is unavoidable. However, it can be argued that, even if the buildings are similar, cities will maintain their own character as a result of cultural diversity, the terrain and the climate, which ultimately determine how people live.

雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文

In some countries the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50, while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70. Meanwhile, we see some politicians enjoying power well into their eighties. Clearly, there is little agreement on an appropriate retirement age.

Until what age do you think people should be encouraged to remain in paid employment?

Model Answer:

Mandatory retirement age varies from society to society, perhaps a reflection of economics, population pressures or simply value systems. Indeed, retirement at 50 can probably be as easily justified as that at 70. It is my belief, however, that the longer an able person is allowed to work, the better for both the individual worker and the employer.

Chronological age is not always a true indicator of ability. While some 65¬ year-olds may not perform as well as they did in their past, many workers at this age do just as well or better than they used to. People's suitability for a position should be a reflection of their performance in the job, rather than the number of wrinkles or grey hairs they have. Employers concerned about the increasing age of their employees need only observe their work records. Those doing poorly may be asked to retire, but those as yet unaffected by age should stay on. Indeed, it would appear economical for an organisation to retain its older employees when possible rather than spend time and money on training new workers.

Remaining in one's job for as long as one is able makes sense as life expectancies increase around the world. As people live longer, they are longer able to contribute to society in the form of meaningful work. But they are also in need of income for a longer period, so a mandatory retirement age of 55 for someone who is statistically likely to live to 77 becomes increasingly difficult to justify. At a time when populations are ageing, governments are less able to provide for their senior citizens, so by keeping able workers in paid employment for as long as is practicable, public expenditures are less strained.

Thus, workers who can still demonstrate their capacity to carry out their work should not be asked to retire simply because they have reached a certain age. Societies that insist on early retirement may do well to look again at their policies.

雅思写作拿高分细节很重要相关文章：

★ 英语满分中考作文10篇合集

★ 高考英语写作40个高级句型整理分享

★ 2020年高考英语写作万能模板

★ 英语作文

★ 英语作文初二10篇【精选】

★ 2020年英语作文万能模板

★ 精选高三英语作文范文三篇

★ 英语120词中考满分作文

★ 英文作文初二120词【精选】

★ 初中英语作文80词精选8篇范文