GRE写作词汇提升秘笈

发布者:天使的脚印 时间:2022-11-15 12:51

对于参加gre写作的小伙伴来说,GRE写作词汇提升是一件很重要的事情?下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作词汇提升秘笈,希望能够帮助到大家,快来学习一下吧。

GRE写作词汇提升秘笈

“联想”一词的方向是不同的。

receptive knowledge的形成取决与在知道一个单词的“长相”的情况下,回忆起单词的“意思”。而productive knowledge则需要训练知道一个意思,找一个具有“合适长相”的单词来表述这个意思。通常情况下,我们在背单词的时候喜欢通过词形去回想词义,因为英语中同义词近义词现象比较严重。

gre写作方法如果要更好的使用高级词汇进行写作,我们需要进行反向的练习。进行关于可以表达一个意思的单词的brainstorming,比如,你可以想一想,可以用来表达“矛盾”的英文词有哪些?这些词该怎么用?

2. productive词汇

即写作词汇,在你的记忆中是和其他很多常用的关联词汇有丰富的联系的,很多单词在你的脑海里都是以这种方式存在的,即language network。当你在写句子的时候,如果你写到这些有关联的词汇的话,这些词汇本身会想起更多的写作词汇。

一个简单的例子就是,有些时候,我们可能发现自己一直在说费话,但是说话的内容我们自己都不知道。这就是因为这种language network的存在你在语言中的用词。

如何提高GRE写作中的词汇量:如何训练写作中的词汇量

1.经常brainstorm可以表达一个特定意思的单词,找尽可能多的单词。

gre写作方法此外,我还会列出一个以中文意思为索引的英文同义词列表,并反复回忆那些可能被用来通过中文意思表达意思的英文单词。

2.进行meaning negotiation practice

如果你还没有掌握一个单词,你可以进行meaning negotiation practice。在学习一个单词的时候,找很多这个单词的例句,通过例句不断猜测单词的意思,直到你找到了一个可以在所有的例句中都解释的通的意思,然后再去看答案。这种方式会促使你更加注意一个词汇的context和collocation,更加有助于你对于一个单词的language network的形成。

3.背诵单词,抄写句子

gre写作怎么练对于你已经学过的单词,如果你想回去把它训练成一个你可以在写作中很容易使用的单词,你可以背诵单词的例子,例句,模仿写作等学习方法。

最后,多读多写

要掌握写作的单词,你必须尽可能多地读和写。尤其是在写作中,刻意模仿别人使用高级词汇的例子,最后形成自己的写作风格。

提升GRE写作水平的六个必须

1.必须研究范文。所谓范文就是诸多专家学者总结出来的重要辅导材料,都是针对考题进行的华丽答论,因此,对于范文,小伙伴们要做的就是不仅能熟记于心,更要对范文进行逐词逐句的分析,分析文章的逻辑顺序,词语的选择,以及文章的修辞,这些都是不可多得的财富。

2.必须要有自己的模板。针对考试,很多小伙伴会因为紧张造成大脑的短路,反而平时常练习的一些词语或者逻辑都会消失,这就要求小伙伴们在平时总结出不同的模板,多加记忆,就算到时候考场紧张,大脑也会条件性的反射出一些具有条例的句子,为自己的作文增光添彩。

3.必须多整改。一旦一篇作文出炉,不能将之束之高阁,要多进行修改,查漏补缺,随时寻找自己文章中的不足,经过反复的修改,才能提高自己的写作水平和创作水平。

4.必须多思考。有思考的人生才是充实的,作文也如此,当我们看的别人优秀的著作时,首先要学习,其次呢,要进行对比,看别人的角度为什么比自己的贴切,从而提升自己看问题的角度。三人行必有我师,要不断的去学习,多思考,充实自己的大脑,为自己的创作提供素材。

5.必须熟悉题库。题库中对每一篇文章都进行了逻辑分析,熟记每道题的逻辑分析,会使你节省大部分的时间,去合理安排自己的作文创作,不要在考试过程中再去分体题目的逻辑,这样会极大地减少你写作的时间。

6.必须善于学习。大家的意见和讨论,有时候可能突然会打通你对一件事的看法,很多时候大家的讨论,对于你来说就说很多不同的角度,多学习对自己有益无害。

这几个必须是针对GRE作文日常学习以及提升的小窍门,进过对GRE范文的理解和背诵,结合别人的优秀著作,别人的多方讨论,整理成自己的模版,这样在日后的考试中,就能吃得一颗定心丸,交出自己满意的答卷。

GRE作文题库之谈“成功”

题目:

In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.

在今天这个媒体铺天盖地的社会中,人们已经很难把任何人当作英雄了。任何人只要是沦为媒体的话题,那么他注定会名声扫地。

正文:

Too often we hear people say that with the ever-increasingly intensive media coverage,no public figure would safely pass the scrutiny of this mass media campaign and eventually subject to the downfall of their reputation as public heroes. I agree that this phenomenon is abundant in the modern society; however, the speaker goes too far in claiming that no woman or man could secure his or her place as heroes.

Admittedly, the mass media has a role in the demystification of a person that were once regarded as a paragon and model of the society he lives in. it is understandable mainly for two reasons. For one thing, the mass media industry’s prosperity owns much to their detailing recording and description of people’s idols. After all, the executive understand that nothing could be more appealing and eye-catching than observing that a public figure making mistakes and thus being banished from the adoring shrines built by public. Consider Nixon’s Water Gate Scandal, Bill Clinton’s sex scandal, and Kennedy’s ex-marital scandal, each of which become the hottest topic being reported on the media coverage. If it were not for the mass media scrutiny, we would expect that people still regard them as the national hero as ever before since as public servant of a country, a politician’s personal moral equates in importance to that of the public moral. The second for the occurrence of this phenomenon is closely related with the psychology of the public. People enjoy the pleasure of seeing famous people do the same stupid thing as they do since it is the nature of human beings to be jealous of the success of others. What is more, some people take the flawless nature of a hero for granted because they consider that as the symbol of a nation, the duty of a hero is to withstand scrutiny from all aspects.

Finishing analyzing why the media scrutiny is so rampant today and how they contribute to the demystification of public heroes, I insist that although heroes are more subject to scrutiny today than the previous century, it is too presumptuous to assert that it is impossible to regard any woman or man as heroes. Everyone has his foibles and to regard those foibles as the yardstick to judge a person may prove to be unfair. The result is deleterious, our society has no people to pay admire, to draw inspiration from. Additionally, even if the psychology of public is critical with who would stand with their scrutiny and secure a place as public models, they learn that heroes are just ordinary people like us and to fully appreciate them requires an unbiased perspective from all sides of their life. Clinton is considered to misuse his power in deceiving public about his wrongdoing as well as his undisciplined behavior.

However, he is still the model of presidents in American history who play an important role in drawing American economy to the right track and tackling many problems rooted in the American society. I pessimistically argue that heroes will always there to be our models and under strict scrutiny, we would more easily observe the true self under the glorious appearance.

What is more, we should observe a strange phenomenon in today’s media industry that is on one hand, they create many heroes and on the other hand they downplay a lot of heroes. We observe too often that a singer may regarded as national hero since he won the favor of fangs all over the world, or a athlete as a hero for the sake that he won the Olympic games, or a entrepreneur as a hero with regard to the economic contribution he devote to the country. These phenomenon aptly informs us that media scrutiny is not always the objective and precise way of examining the qualification of a hero and we would not rely on them to make judgment. Thus it is no sensible to declare that the media will hold the power of diminishing heroes since the claim downplay the rational thinking by modern people.

To sum up, I concede with speaker insofar as the mass media scrutiny power exerted by modern media industry. However, the speaker goes too far to claim the result would be the diminishing of any woman or man heroes, which I am strongly against.This conclusion misconstrues the role placed on media as well as underestimating the critical analyzing ability of modern people.

GRE写作词汇提升秘笈相关文章:

★ 英语学习

Copyright © 2022-2024 领地网 www.lingd.cn 版权所有 蜀ICP备09043158号-4

声明:本网站尊重并保护知识产权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果我们转载的作品侵犯了您的权利,请在一个月内通知我们,我们会及时删除。