托福写作到底能不能用模板?学会合理使用是关键。下面小编就和大家分享托福写作到底能不能用模板?学会合理使用是关键，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

托福写作到底能不能用模板?学会合理使用是关键

托福写作考试到底能不能用模板?

首先小编要来为大家解答一个比较常见的疑惑，那就是托福写作部分考生到底能不能用模板。对于模板template，小编认为大家首先要了解什么叫做模板。目前市面上比较常见的各类托福写作模板，既有整篇文章形式，内容大部分都是固定的模板，也有只带有基本框架和一些句式结构的模板，或是开头结尾中间某个段落的模板。在小编看来，如果只是框架性质的模板，大部分内容仍然需要考生自己去填充，那么这样的模板用在托福写作考试中并不会造成什么问题。但如果是那些有大量内容完整段落甚至句子的模板，那么这些模板用在托福写作考试中显然是风险极大容易触碰扣分红线的。

托福写作高分模板要靠自己打造

那么，托福写作使用模板能否拿到高分呢?在小编看来这一点同样是可以做到的，前提是作文模板要靠自己来打造。现在很多同学选择或是寻找模板都是直接当伸手党在网上或者各类资料中找现成的模板来用，这样的模板你能用别人也能用，千篇一律之下自然难以保证高分。托福写作想要靠模板拿到高分，考生就需要学会自己打造模板。具体做法是寻找一些高分优质范文，然后尝试把范文中的论述框架和关键部分的句式结构提炼出来，再用自己的表达方式进行paraphrase，改造成自己习惯同时能够保证原意不变的句式结构，之后再整体打磨一下语句，一份专属于自己的模板就完成了。这种做法不仅能保证模板具有很高的原创度能够给考官耳目一新的感觉，在打造的过程中也能加深大家对词句的理解以及对模板的记忆印象，并锻炼大家词汇句式替换的能力技巧，好处是相当多的。使用这样的模板去参加托福写作考试，想要拿到高分也会更有把握。

托福写作框架型模板实例介绍

上面提到了模板建议使用框架型，可能很多同学对这个定义还不太了解，其实框架型模板与其说是模板，更像是一份提前拟定好的基本提纲或者说是结构套路，下面小编就托福独立写作和综合写作各给大家分享一例：

托福独立写作框架模板

段落分配

结构要点

开头段

1. 介绍题目背景信息

2. 提出自身看法观点

主体段A1. 每段开头有过渡词汇词

主体段B2. 每段要有清晰的主题句

主体段C (自选)组3. 每段要有具体论述内容

结尾段

1.开头要有过渡词组，比如To sum up, in summary, in conclusion, to conclude, etc..)

2. 要有重申观点和开头呼应的内容

3. 要有对主体段大意的概括总结

托福综合写作框架模板(适用于听力部分反驳阅读内容的情况)

The reading and the lecture are both about ____. Whereas the author of the reading states that ____, the lecturer suggests that ____. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing two/three reasons.

First of all, according to the reading, ____. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He/She says that ____. Furthermore, he/she mentions that ____.

Secondly, the reading states that ____. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He/She argues that ____. In addition, he/she points out ____.

Finally, the reading claims that ____. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that ____. He/She thinks that ____. Moreover, he/she feels that ____.

In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about ____, the two/three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.

托福写作：题库范文附思路解析

1. What natural resource that is disappearing needs to be saved?

Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water.

Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

『分析』

很容易的选择，以森林为例：

用一段陈述中国的森林被怎样破坏，又是怎样需要大量的树木……

然后再说如果破坏了森林，会导致很多自然灾害，进而产生经济损失……

树木的好处[155]有详细地说明。

『范文』

The world's resources are incredibly important, and as the world's population grows higher and faster, it is difficult to hold on to these precious assets. While all resources have their own important uses, I believe that forests are the resource that we should be most concerned about preserving.

Trees provide three important functions in the ecosystem. First, they transpire water into the air, creating clouds, and therefore, rain. Without trees, this cycle is interrupted, and rainfall is drastically reduced to minimal levels. Second, trees hold topsoil in place and soften the impact of water on the ground. This is of utmost importance in rain forests, where decomposition is rapid and because of this, the layer of topsoil might only be five to ten centimeters deep. Finally, trees are important to the ecosystem because they protect streams from debris and silt. If the trees were all removed, there would be nothing holding back this dirt from our rivers, destroying the aquatic environment.

Trees also, of course, provide natural beauty to a country. This is very important for tourism, as many visitors enjoy going on long hikes through wooded areas, and taking in the beautiful scenery. If a country has no natural beauty, there will be little draw for tourists to come and visit. While cities can be exciting, most people are drawn to these natural jewels.

Forested area is also the main habitat for a plethora of animal species. In fact, most of the extinction and endangerment of animals today can be attributed to habitat destruction. If we continue our trend in deforesting the world, we will soon find ourselves living in a barren wasteland, with no wildlife to keep us company. The effects of the extinction of even one species of animal is yet unknown. Breaking the food chain on even one level might have profound ripples through all life on earth.

2. Does a zoo have no useful purpose?

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.

『分析』

不能同意，no是绝对修饰词。但是要指出确实有一些动物园不值得保留下去。

『范文』

Perhaps one of the most blameworthy factors that make some people raise the eyebrow to zoos and criticize that "A zoo has no useful purpose" is its exorbitant price to maintain. However, it is too hasty to say so, since most zoos have their significance, both educational and scientific. Modern zoos act as centers of education and are designed to make learning about animals an interesting and enjoyable experience. They provide visitors with the chance to see rare creatures, such as tigers, zebras, penguins, and giant pandas, which come from many different parts of the globe. Zoos also introduce people to their own local wildlife, offering a valuable learning experience in an increasingly urban world. At the same time, most zoos provide educational programs aimed at a wide range of ages. A visit to a zoo provides children an opportunity to see and touch animals other than household pets. For older schoolchildren, many zoos conduct classes or day trips that focus on different aspects of animal biology and the impact of humans on animal life.

Modern zoos also have their scientific imports and can function as a sanctuary for endangered animals and therefore help maintaining ecosystems. In zoos scientists can create an animal population that can become self-sustaining in the wild. An example of a successful reintroduction to the wild is the David's deer. This Asian deer was native to marshlands in northeast China before its habitat was destroyed more than 800 years ago and it became extinct in the wild. Since that time the species has been bred in zoos in China and later in Europe. In 1985 four David's deer were released to the wild in a protected animal reserve in China, where they are now breeding successfully.

On the other hand, some experts warn against placing too much reliance on zoos as biological "arks," where species can be protected regardless of environmental changes outside. Critics warn that zoos, like all human institutions, are vulnerable to unforeseen events, such as disease, fires, and financial or social upheaval. More significantly, the number of species that zoos can protect is strictly limited. Today's zoos are home to no more than a few thousand species—only a fraction of the world's animal life. Zoos already have to perform a delicate balancing act between large, crowd-attracting animals and threatened animals that have less visitor appeal. During the 21st century, zoo experts will face even harder decisions about which species they can afford to save.

3. Is banning smoking in public places a good rule or a bad rule?

In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.

『分析』

当然是好规矩。吸烟的害处;在公共场合吸烟的害处：对不吸烟的人有害;可能引起火灾……吸烟没有好处。

『范文』

In spite of all of the known dangers of smoking, people all over the world continue to indulge in this terrible habit. By allowing people to partake in a cigarette whenever they please, the government is encouraging the smokers' early death. Smoking should be made illegal in all public places as it is very dangerous to one's health, it endangers the life of people who must work in smoky environments, and it makes it difficult for smokers to cut down on their nicotine intake, as they can smoke everywhere. As mentioned above, there are a vast number of illnesses caused by cigarette smoke. The major disease caused by smoking is lung cancer. This particular type of cancer alone kills more people each year than any other illness.

Not only is it associated with lung cancer, it is also associated with heart disease, birth defects and a host of other disorders. On a more aesthetic level, smoking yellows one's teeth and hands, which makes him unattractive. Most people also find the smell of a smoker to be undesirable. It is not only the smoker himself who is injured by his habit. People who must work in smoky environments, such as barmaids and waiters, are susceptible to all of the above-mentioned ailments. Also, the children and spouse of a smoker will be affected by the constant smoke in their environment, and will also be adversely affected. It is unfair for people to suffer for other's bad habits. If one could only smoke in the privacy of one's home, many lives would be saved.

Finally, it is important to disallow smokers to smoke in public because doing so increases their likelihood of smoking often. If a person must go into a private area to smoke, they would be less likely to do so. It is an inconvenience, and the smoker would therefore partake in a cigarette less often. In many places in the world, it is very cold in the winter. If a person had to smoke outside in these conditions, they would be far less likely to do so. This would eventually make it easier for the smoker to quit the habit. Therefore, I believe that it would be beneficial for everyone if smokers were only allowed to have a cigarette while in private smoking areas. Enforcing this rule would save thousands of lives, and would also decrease the amount spent on health care dramatically.